Daylight Saving Time Debate: Congressional Impasse

From Standard Time to Daylight Saving Time: A Nation Divided

As millions of Americans prepare to savor an extra hour of sleep while bidding farewell to late afternoon sunlight with the end of daylight saving time, a contentious debate looms on the horizon. The century-old tradition of clock adjustments, observed by many with skepticism, is under increasing scrutiny from state legislatures across the nation.

Since 2018, the majority of states have either passed or considered legislation aimed at dismantling the biannual time shift. A significant 19 states have gone further, endorsing laws or resolutions supporting the year-round observance of daylight saving time, as revealed by data from the National Conference of State Legislatures.

However, a critical roadblock stands in the way of these state initiatives: an archaic 1960s law that necessitates congressional action for any substantial change to occur. Daylight saving time has been a fixture in the United States since 1918, introduced by President Woodrow Wilson under the Standard Time Act during World War I. The Uniform Time Act of 1966 later mandated uniformity in start and end dates, effectively prohibiting states from adopting year-round daylight saving time without prior congressional approval.

Nevertheless, states do have the option to exempt themselves from this time-switching ritual by adhering to standard time throughout the year. This approach is embraced by areas such as Hawaii, most of Arizona, and U.S. Islands like American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands.

In recent years, the movement to cease clock adjustments has gained momentum. In 2018, Florida initiated the Sunshine Protection Act, which would commit the state to permanent daylight saving time contingent upon federal authorization. On a federal scale, Senator Marco Rubio, R-Fla., introduced the national Sunshine Protection Act, aiming to establish daylight saving as the year-round standard with provisions for areas currently exempt. The legislation sailed through the Senate unanimously in 2022 but hit a roadblock in the House during the previous session. Rubio reintroduced the bill in March.

States in favor of permanent daylight saving time, like Ohio, argue that it enhances safety, curtails crime rates, reduces car accidents, and lowers energy consumption, while also providing extended opportunities for outdoor activities.

The American Academy of Sleep Medicine, a leading medical association advocating for sleep health improvements, has thrown its weight behind the complete elimination of daylight saving time. They contend that standard time is better aligned with people’s natural circadian rhythms, thus promoting health and safety.

The biannual clock adjustments themselves raise concerns supported by research. Studies have shown that the “spring forward” change contributes to increased workplace injuries, higher car crash fatalities, and elevated heart attack risks. A study in 2023 further revealed that a week after the transition, individuals reported heightened sleep dissatisfaction and increased rates of insomnia.

With the looming specter of daylight saving time’s resurgence on March 10, 2024, the battle over this time-honored tradition continues to divide and captivate the nation.


Visit for more – Soul String Report

Leave a Comment